Interesting

That looks like a big "suck it" to all the import and ford guys that say we didn't need a bail out.

Toyota needed it to compete in nascar.

2jz-U-Ltr wrote:

Toyota needed it to compete in nascar.

LOL

]quote="nightrunner06"]

brngrhd wrote:

That looks like a big "suck it" to all the import and ford guys that say we didn't need a bail out.

[/quote]

Mike

^ LOL, nice work mikey.

It did not go as well as i intended.

Mike

You all do know what they did with this money is, the Fed loaned it to them at almost 0% and they purchased treasury bonds that paid from 1.5-3.25% with no risk, which is the same thing all the big banks were and still are doing.

I couldnt care less if they burned it.

Bod89lx wrote:

You all do know what they did with this money is, the Fed loaned it to them at almost 0% and they purchased treasury bonds that paid from 1.5-3.25% with no risk, which is the same thing all the big banks were and still are doing.

Shut up fag. No one cares. They took money period...... Hell it almost makes it worse that they took it and didn't need it.

Every company and person in this country would take the money even if they didn't need it.

Damm straight!!! If I could make a few percent on on free money with no risk why the hell not.

2jz-U-Ltr wrote:

Every company and person in this country would take the money even if they didn't need it.

Don't hate the player cuz u don't like the game pimp a limp.

brngrhd wrote:

Bod89lx wrote:

You all do know what they did with this money is, the Fed loaned it to them at almost 0% and they purchased treasury bonds that paid from 1.5-3.25% with no risk, which is the same thing all the big banks were and still are doing.

Shut up fag. No one cares. They took money period...... Hell it almost makes it worse that they took it and didn't need it.

brngrhd wrote:

That looks like a big "suck it" to all the import and ford guys that say we didn't need a bail out.

dont see honda on that list. so suck my ass.

mr.johnson wrote:

brngrhd wrote:

That looks like a big "suck it" to all the import and ford guys that say we didn't need a bail out.

dont see honda on that list. so suck my ass.

Your right

2jz-U-Ltr wrote:

Every company and person in this country would take the money even if they didn't need it.

You might be right, but that's not my point. The we didn't take money because we are awesome, but oh wait turns out we did take money, bullshit is what I'm talking about. I don't give two fucks why they took it, they took it.

Fords are slow. Chevys are gay.

and honda's suck.

Pontiacs are the best.

That's why they still make them

mr.johnson wrote:

brngrhd wrote:

That looks like a big "suck it" to all the import and ford guys that say we didn't need a bail out.

dont see honda on that list. so suck my ass.

If You read the article it actully does talk about Honda....


"The Fed also lent $13 billion to investors who bought bonds backed by loans to new car buyers from automakers and banks. The Fed made clear that while investors got the loans, the move was meant to keep the lenders in business; the credit arms of Ford, Chrysler, Nissan, Volkswagen, Honda and Hyundai all benefited directly."

brngrhd wrote:

That looks like a big "suck it" to all the import and ford guys that say we didn't need a bail out.

WRONG

nightrunner06 wrote:

brngrhd wrote:

That looks like a big "suck it" to all the import and ford guys that say we didn't need a bail out.

WRONG

Bod89lx wrote:

You all do know what they did with this money is, the Fed loaned it to them at almost 0% and they purchased treasury bonds that paid from 1.5-3.25% with no risk, which is the same thing all the big banks were and still are doing.

RIGHT


The companies in thus article did not take or need bailout money. Try again.

your right I worded it wrong. I know they didn't need it but you would know that if you read my other responses.

I dont have all day to sit around trying to decipher your writing haha