Dyno vid

My car made 405/396 thru an auto



My fathers car made 390/416 thru a T-5

Nice.

jizz rocket.

That just sounds awesome! How is the transmission?

Mike

MikeyT wrote:

That just sounds awesome! How is the transmission?

Mike

Out of commission! Have not had time to look @ it, and I wont have time for a while.

Nice. And I remember seeing this car at Automotion.

post the first pull to last results

ma70tt wrote:

post the first pull to last results

First pull was aborted @ 4500 . made 321 HP 2nd pull was 388, 3rd was 400.5, 4th was 405, 5th was 405

ah... so ur untuned nnumbers on my dyno were right compared to these dynojet numbers

No they were not.... His first tune was not his other tune, it was a start from blank tune. His old tune made something like 10-15hp less but was not even close to as smooth. So the 295 on yours was about 100 shy.

^^^What he said.

After Mikes tune, we loaded Dons tune into the car and made a pull. It made 400 to the tire but it was not as smooth!So there is 105 HP between Dyno's

bs, lets compare apples to apples here guys. were comparing a 248x to a md1100se thats a 20k difference in machines. & its a proven point that dynojet #'s are calculated so...

Nate your on fucking drugs...... First his is not a 248, second how is this not an apples to apples comparison, third your dyno had given fucked up numbers forever, fourth all dyno numbers are calculated but a dynojet is more repeatable numbers from dyno to dyno and day to day because all your doing is spinning a known weight and it measures how fast it is done which is work over time better known as hp.

If your dyno is so accurate then why does andys 408 big solid roller big heads make 295 and a year later aarons car which is a stock 302 with 180K on it that has h/i/c makes 300...... Theed numbers on your dyno have never been accurate. I don't care because I never cared what the number was just what it did while tuning, so your dyno served me just fine.

So don't come on here and try to prove anything because there is nothing to prove. Andy's car made what it made...... It was not there to make numbers it was there to get tuned.

1-sorry/224x.
2-its not apples to apples cuz its not the same machine.
3-my machine has never given fucked up #'s, not in 6 years. i spend alot of time & $ to make sure thats the way it is.
4-all #'s are not calculated, but a dynojets #'s are calcualated from a "fudge factor"

a dynojet is a "fudged" # because when they got done making their software it didnt work, so they created a "fudge factor" to make their #'s believable. this is fact & i would be happy to post an article & link from dynojets chief engineer about this fact.

that said, how is someone going to tune a car with a fixed weight? i can see an n/a car being close, but with a car that requires proper load to make boost that doesnt work. this is proven & fact.

my opinion is i think andys car wasnt tuned, aarons car was as good as it could be w/o knowing afr's thats where the #'s lie. that said i revert back to andys untuned "dynojet" # & i am correct here. tuned his car would prob make 360 or so at my place. where am i wrong?

that said his afr's arent as good as they could be with a proper load.

His car made 295 on your dyno and trapped 121? Nate your numbers are Low as fuck. And a mustang dyno can be changed to read whatever you want. A dyno jet's calibration is locked in and won't very much dyno jet to dyno jet.

If your numbers are do accurate how does a heads cam 302 with 185K make MORE power the a fully built 408? Oh wait it won't. How is it that at the mustang dyno day you even told people since you changed computers your HP numbers went up? Thought it was all dialed in and accurate. How does one mustang make 450 wheel and another 295 and they run door to door?

What a bunch of dyno queens!!

FartapotomosCholesterauls wrote:

His car made 295 on your dyno and trapped 121? Nate your numbers are Low as fuck. And a mustang dyno can be changed to read whatever you want. A dyno jet's calibration is locked in and won't very much dyno jet to dyno jet.

when (date) & where did the 295/121 happen?
show me how to change "calibration" on a mustang dyno. i have yet to hear of this or see it in the past 6 years.

brngrhd wrote:

If your numbers are do accurate how does a heads cam 302 with 185K make MORE power the a fully built 408? Oh wait it won't. How is it that at the mustang dyno day you even told people since you changed computers your HP numbers went up? Thought it was all dialed in and accurate. How does one mustang make 450 wheel and another 295 and they run door to door?

i would say once again one was not tuned, maybe? you were not there so what you hear is what is called "hearsay". i have no idea where ur going at the end there so i got nothin'

i suppose there is no way i know whats going on though, so ill be wrong.

The same night andy and I both made 295 and torque was with in 15..... on your dyno he went 11.2@120 mine went 12.2@115 I think we entered the same info for both so how do those numbers line up? My car which is lighter and made the same hp would have gotten my does rapped off by andy's car. Your dyno doesn't give accurate or repeatable numbers. It works great for tuning but that's it.

Andy and Aaron were there for the mustang dyno day where you told them since you changed computers your numbers went up. But they are also known to be huge liars and stand a lot to gain by doing so......

right on